Saturday, February 16, 2013

Cycle 3: Should the Curriculum Address Controversial Issues


How should I, a kindergarten teacher of four, five, and six year olds, take on the challenges and changes of today’s society; while still preserving their innocence?  Wow, this seemed like a huge question that I continued to reflect back on as I completed all of the supplemental readings/materials for this week. 

Before I dig deeper into this cycles material and my connections or thoughts with it.  I want to start off sharing my initial thoughts as I read the Introduction to Cycle 3.  

Throughout the reading of Cycle 3 I kept thinking back to my experience as a student in kindergarten through high school. Throughout my schooling experience I can remember students that were bullied and students that were just different.  I can remember in high school hearing more about homosexuality but with regards to the way I was brought up I just sort of dismissed it and never really considered it anymore.  Now this does not mean I was not aware that there were students amongst me that were indeed gay or lesbian but I just never really thought of them as being different.   When I was in high school I was very involved in soccer (both club and school), I ran cross-country, I was in the band, I was also a member of various organizations both in my high school and in my community.  Needless to say I had many different types of friends and could easily get along with everyone that I met.  Some of my favorite memories are from my high school years.  It is hard to think that for some people this was some of their worst memories or a time where they actually considered ending their life. I guess in a way I was sheltered from all the bullying and hate that some kids faced on a daily basis.  It was not till my senior year of high school that I heard a real story about how bullying and our society’s attitudes towards gays and lesbians ended a person’s life.  One of my soccer teammates brothers, whom at every practice helped us with ball control, committed suicide because he was a victim of bullying based on the fact that he was gay.  I remember that time clearly and that was a time where I needed my parents support more than ever.  I needed to make sense of this all.

Now as I began to dig deeper into this cycles material I had to put my emotions a side and think, how can I, a kindergarten teacher teach my students about sexuality and tolerance?

When I first started teaching kindergarten, three years ago, I thought that all my students were as innocent as I imagined I once was when I was in kindergarten.  However, I quickly learned that my students are aware of the challenges society faces today.  They are aware in the most simplistic of ways but many of them over hear things through their parents, older siblings, neighbors, or from kids on the bus. It is true that young students are not as innocent as I once imagined.  Therefore, as teachers I believe that we do need to be there for our students and help them make sense of what they are hearing.  As Jonathan Silin, stated, “The role of teachers is to help their students make sense of the world.” (246).  We need to help our young children replace fear with an understanding and misinformation by facts. (Silin, 246).  This is crucial in making school a safe place for our students.  Knowing this I do believe that it would be beneficial to have a time, whether it is a part of our health class, or a part of a social learning time.  But have a time where teachers teach the most simplistic issues that are in our society.  One way I believe that I could fit in a beginning discussion about homosexuality is through the conversation about what is a family?  What makes a family diverse?  During the first marking period, in kindergarten, we have great discussions and lessons covering: Who I am? Where I came from?  Who is in my family?  Who I live with?  These topics spark lots of discussion because we quickly can see that many students do not have a traditional family.  Many of my students are from single parent families, grandparents raising the families, aunt and mom raising all the kids and cousins, just a variety of family settings.  Immediately at the beginning of the year my students can share about their families, which allows them to make a connection and feel more secure at school.  We also talk about what culture we are from and special activities or traditions that our families have.  This is just a great way for each student to feel accepted and appreciated.  This also may be an opportune time for students to connect and ask a question or share a thought regarding a current topic in society.   I agree with Jonathan Silin in that “teachers need to create environments in which human differences are discussed and valued.” (252).  If we create this opportunity, young children, especially kindergartners will share some of their random thoughts or concerns.  For example, I have had a student raise their hand and ask me why do teachers have to be girls?  The student based this information on the teachers that he saw everyday in our wing of the building, and we just happened to all be females.  Young learners are full of these questions and it is up to us as a teacher to help guide them through correcting these misinterpretations.  Erik Eckholm’s article referenced the “welcoming schools” curriculum for grade schools, so I went to this website to explore more.   I found the following video or trailer for this project to be very fascinating.



After watching this video I explored further because as a teacher of young children I am still hesitant on going into lots of details with my young learners.  This website provided me with a list of guidelines for teachers to use as a place to begin when talking about gender and children.  Here is this link. http://www.welcomingschools.org/pages/gender-children-place-to-begin

As I read through this list, I was relieved to see that many of these things I already do in my classroom.  For example it is important to create an atmosphere of acceptance in the classroom that affirms all children, I do this with my family and who am I unit. Another tip is that teachers need to greet all children and avoid using the phrase boys and girls.  I call my students, “friends” or “learners”.  You can often hear me say good morning friends or learners show me you are ready!  Another tip was role-play with your students.  I do this all the time, especially when going over expectations, procedures, or when discussing bullying.  

I am curious to know if other grade levels could also agree that they follow some or most of the guidelines already for Educators.   Also, what do you think about this guideline, “Establish a gender-neutral bathroom in your school that students can use.”  I have this in my classroom because in all our kindergarten classrooms we have one kid bathroom that all our students use.  I just wonder how this would work for the other grades.   

Finally, I am a teacher that likes to see things in action.  I would like to observe a program or sit and talk with other teachers who have been involved in a specific program before I test it out myself.  So, I began to wonder what programs were out there for kindergarten students.  How detailed did this information need to be presented, while still preserving our young students innocents or the parents right to filtering content?  I found this Sex Education Curriculum for Farmington Public Schools, with a date of 2007.  It is very likely that this information has changed but something for me to refer to.  I scrolled through and a lot of the major discussions began in fourth grade but than if you scroll down to page 25, it provides us with a quick synopsis of the ideas that are covered in kindergarten through third grades.  I felt very comfortable with this information and think that it could be implemented perfectly into my school’s health curriculum as we already talk about drugs, alcohol, good touch/bad touch, strangers, etc.    I am curious as to what others think about this curriculum and if this is something they have seen implemented in your school district or if you use something else? 


For my closing thoughts, I think back to what City Councilman Joel Burns had to share.  School must be a safe place to learn and grow.  We as teachers need to provide students with the knowledge and tools to be able to function safely and respectfully in our community.  As a kindergarten teacher, I need to make sure to correct my student’s misunderstandings through children’s books or other interactive learning experiences, all while keeping it age appropriate.  I also need to be there to support my students and bring an end to bullying!  After all, it is important for our students to learn at a young age, just how important they are.  “Society will change, please live long enough to see it… The bullying and harassment has to stop!” (Joel Burns, 2010).  We all can make a difference for the students we teach, even if they are just beginning their education process.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Cycle 2: What Should Schools Teach? How Should They Be Held Accountable?


As I went through Cycle two’s readings, I began to see that many of the articles referred to making education practical and current in today’s world.  This leads me right into what should schools teach? 

What Should Schools Teach?

Since I am a current Kindergarten teacher, my initial reaction is that I need to teach to the standards so that my students can become successful.  Also, if my students have mastered the Common Core Standards than I will see them become more confident in themselves and their own learning.  However, keeping in mind what I learned from Cycle One, I know that there is much more to teaching than the standards.  This leads me to ponder about my own teaching and what should I teach in my classroom.  I do believe that I need to teach the standards but how do I go about teaching them.  This is what I feel really brings this Cycle’s information to life.  Technology, technology, technology!  My students LOVE using technology.  Technology is a part of the lifestyle today.  Everywhere we go people are using technology, whether it is through their phone, lap top, ipad, tablets, or a variety of other devices.  Technology has become a part of our lifestyle and we, as teachers, need to bring it into the classroom and have technology be a part of our learning.  I am thankful to have an interactive whiteboard in my classroom, as well as I have access to a computer lab and a tablet lab.  I have quickly learned that my students are fully engaged when we are using some form of technology. 

This brings me to the article titled Learning By Playing Video Games in the Classroom, which highlighted the type of schooling called Quest to Learn.  Quest to learn is a structured school where students’ learning is organized around video games.  This idea was mind boggling to me.  I cannot imagine teaching my students only using video games.  Where would all the social skills go?  Would our students be able to interact in a positive way in society?  What about our students that lack the most simple technology skills?  Would our students be able to collaborate with others face to face?  Many questions continued to come to mind as I read and thought more about this article.  As I reflect on my current students learning I can see when there would be certain situations that it would be very fun to engage my students in a video game type learning.  For example, when we talk about where we live.  It would be fun to find a program where my students could design a city that they would live in.  Adding all the essential needs in a city.  We would be able to discuss location of objects in the city, distance from different places, etc.  I can just imagine how excited students would become being immersed in this form of technology.  I also can see the benefits of making teaching practical for the students and allow them to work in teams to challenge and express their thinking.

This brings me to Geoff Mulgan’s idea of a Studio School.   In a Studio School a majority of the curriculum is done through practical projects where the students are learning by doing.  The webcast stated that this form of schooling is aimed at teenagers, however I can see how even five and six year olds would really excel in this form of schooling.   I found this idea to be so fascinating and I was eager to learn more about it.   I went on a search to see if there was any Studio Schools in the United States.  I found the following website for a Studio School in New York. http://www.studioschoolnyc.org/about_us.htm

Interestingly enough this school has been around since 1971, where it opened as a one-room schoolhouse that taught 25 students’ ages 4 to 12.   The students mission is “educate the hearts and minds of children as we nurture the unfolding of their authentic spirit and character.  Our students learn to value intellectual and creative ideas, and to take pleasure in the process of discovery….” (The Studio School).  As I continued to explore the website I found that there are classes from the age of nearly two all the way through middle school.  This school has its curriculum structured for exploring and mastering how to learn and how to think.  It empowers the students to integrate what they learn with who they are.   This school does teach specific skills like math, reading, dance but instead of just teaching these skills this school provides experiences for the students so that they can “take the skills and concepts they are mastering and use them cohesively and in a productive manner.”  I believe providing experiences integrating math, reading, science, social studies, and the fine arts are a great way to promote learning and teach my students.
 
How Should Schools Be Held Accountable?

However, if I only teach through creating experiences for my students, than how would I be held accountable?  This led me to reflect upon the ways that I am currently being held accountable at my job and my thoughts regarding this.   Currently I am being held accountable through two major systems, one being principal observations and the other being standardized testing.  Let me briefly share my thoughts on both.  Principal observations are a great interactive way for teachers to be held accountable.  These observations are a time where Principals are in our classrooms watching and critiquing our teaching.  At my school my principal does a wonderful job providing positive remarks as to strengths and areas of improvement with our teaching and with the way that she observes our students learning.  I find this to be such a motivating time where I really feel like I am being held accountable for what and how I am teaching in the classroom.  However, this does not provide detailed data that states how my students are performing.  That is where standardized testing comes into play.  Yes, even for my kindergarten students!  Even at the beginning of the year, when some are only four years old and have just stepped into their first classroom experience, we are testing them!  At times I do believe we go a bit crazy with testing.  However, I do enjoy diving into student data to help me determine my teaching weaknesses or where I need to intervene with some of my students.  I do believe that standardized testing is helping me be held accountable but there is just TOO much of it!  In Chapter 5, Cultural Literacy and the Schools, Hirsch states “it appears the chief factor in academic achievement is the time the student spends in studying the material to be mastered.” (Hirsch, 115).  Meaning it is most crucial for teachers to be aware of the student’s time on task.  Interestingly enough, my school just had a professional development afternoon where our presenter had each grade level do a time on task evaluation of your entire day at school.  We had to do a time audit that shared exactly when we were teaching, what we were teaching, and for how long.  If you have not ever done this, do it!  It was so amazing to see how many little things take away from your entire day of learning, like morning announcements.   Doing this time audit allowed each grade level to be held more accountable to students on task learning! Hirsch also stated “schools across our nation should share common goals but their means for achieving goals should be varied and adaptive.” (Hirsh 127).  I believe that this simply makes sense.  Curriculum should be shared across the nation and we should be teaching similar things.  However, should a lot of time be spent on teaching for a test?  This is a hot topic in education today!   The following article, shares some of the side effects of standardized testing.   http://gazette.teachers.net/gazette/wordpress/howard-seeman/the-side-effects-of-standardized-testing/

This article makes me question standardized testing in its validity to being practical and current in today’s world.  Just one quote to end on, the article shared “in inner-city schools, testing anxiety not only consumes about a third of the year, …every minute of the school day…to be directed to a specifically stated test-related skill.”  Is this making learning fun for our students?  Are our students actually learning?  Or should we reconsider creating those well-rounded experiences, where our students can be exploring new ideas while reconstructing older thoughts throughout all subject areas!